Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

The commenter opposes the proposed citizen petition to create a registry of trans women, arguing that it would endanger transgender individuals and violate their privacy and medical autonomy. They contend that gender-affirming care is medically beneficial and that the petition is motivated by prejudice rather than genuine concern.

Lauren H. Schwartz expresses support for the petition by highlighting the importance of safe and private access to gender-affirming hormone therapy. She argues against creating barriers to medical care and opposes the idea of placing trans individuals on a registry for prescribed medications.

A cisgender woman opposes the proposed action, arguing that restricting access to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for transgender individuals violates their right to medical treatment and harms their well-being. She also strongly opposes the creation of a registry for transgender women, citing concerns over privacy violations, harassment, and sexism.

Lauren H. Schwartz, a private citizen, opposes the proposed action because she believes it would lead to the tracking, restriction, and potential harm of transgender individuals. She argues that placing individuals on a list and restricting estrogen prescriptions is dangerous and unlawful.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that restricting estrogen access based on sex assigned at birth is discriminatory and endangers transgender women. They express concern over the privacy risks of a user registry and advocate for equal access to medicine without surveillance.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it violates privacy rights and allows the government to interfere in personal medical decisions. They specifically highlight concerns regarding transphobia and the potential negative impact on individuals requiring estrogen for various medical reasons.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that it relies on fearmongering, false assumptions, and skewed information regarding cancer risks and suicide rates. They specifically argue that the petition's proposed restrictions on medication would harm transgender individuals and that the petition's goals are aligned with discriminatory political agendas.