Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.
- Posted
- Dec 23, 2025
- Comment period
- Dec 23, 2025 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Access to gender-affirming care | Black box warning for estrogen | Civil liberties and privacy | Hrt informed consent model | Impact on transgender healthcare |
|---|
7 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 12, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 6, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed citizen petition, arguing that it violates human rights to privacy and dignity and expresses strong moral and religious objections to the proposal.
Read comment → - Apr 5, 2026Comment from Kaminsky, BethanyOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 2, 2026Comment from Carter, JoyOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it represents government overreach into private lives and medical decisions. They characterize the petition as an attempt at authoritarian control and urge the FDA to stay out of personal matters.
Read comment → - Apr 2, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 1, 2026Comment from Damore, E.OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the creation of a registry for Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) users, arguing that the treatment is well-researched and safe. They suggest that concerns regarding safety or exploitation should be handled by law enforcement rather than through FDA regulation.
Read comment → - Apr 1, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 1, 2026Comment from Diltz, RoseOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 31, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 28, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
