Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

The commenter, identifying as a social work professional, opposes the petition on the grounds that it is based on bigotry and misunderstanding. They argue that hormone replacement therapy is not a communicable disease and that the petition puts transgender people in danger.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it violates privacy rights and allows the government to interfere in personal medical decisions. They specifically highlight concerns regarding transphobia and the potential negative impact on individuals requiring estrogen for various medical reasons.

The commenter opposes the proposed restrictions and registration of transgender women, arguing that they are human beings who do not pose an inherent danger. They suggest that the government should focus on more pressing issues like gun violence and environmental impacts instead.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that it relies on "vile rhetoric" and "disinformation" to restrict medical access for transgender women. They contend that the petition seeks to empower medical gatekeeping and erase the rights of transgender individuals rather than ensuring their safety.