Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, characterizing it as a misrepresentation of scientific data and an attempt to penalize transgender women. They argue that estrogen is a standard medication that should be treated as such.

The commenter opposes the proposed citizen petition to create a registry of trans women, arguing that it would endanger transgender individuals and violate their privacy and medical autonomy. They contend that gender-affirming care is medically beneficial and that the petition is motivated by prejudice rather than genuine concern.

Lauren H. Schwartz expresses support for the petition by highlighting the importance of safe and private access to gender-affirming hormone therapy. She argues against creating barriers to medical care and opposes the idea of placing trans individuals on a registry for prescribed medications.

A cisgender woman opposes the proposed action, arguing that restricting access to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for transgender individuals violates their right to medical treatment and harms their well-being. She also strongly opposes the creation of a registry for transgender women, citing concerns over privacy violations, harassment, and sexism.

Lauren H. Schwartz shares a personal testimonial about how hormone therapy has significantly improved her mental health and quality of life. She supports the action by highlighting the positive impact of access to this care on her personal well-being and ability to function in her community.

Lauren H. Schwartz, a private citizen, opposes the proposed action because she believes it would lead to the tracking, restriction, and potential harm of transgender individuals. She argues that placing individuals on a list and restricting estrogen prescriptions is dangerous and unlawful.

The commenter opposes the creation of a registry for trans women seeking gender-affirming care, arguing that such a policy is unconstitutional and violates the right to healthcare. They assert that trans women should be treated as women and that the proposed policy lacks scientific and moral justification.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that restricting estrogen access based on sex assigned at birth is discriminatory and endangers transgender women. They express concern over the privacy risks of a user registry and advocate for equal access to medicine without surveillance.