Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

The commenter opposes the proposed restrictions and registration of transgender women, arguing that they are human beings who do not pose an inherent danger. They suggest that the government should focus on more pressing issues like gun violence and environmental impacts instead.

The commenter, identifying as a transgender individual, opposes the proposed action because it creates unnecessary barriers to healthcare and medication for trans women. They argue that the proposal is discriminatory, impractical for doctors, and that the creation of an official registry for trans women is a violation of privacy.

The commenter opposes the proposed petition, arguing against the creation of a federal registry for trans women receiving estrogen, mandatory psychiatric gatekeeping, and boxed warnings. They characterize the petition as being backed by hate groups and advocate for the interests of trans and gender nonconforming people.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that adding warnings or registries for the medication is unnecessary, violates privacy, and could lead to restricted access that increases suicide risks. They advocate for maintaining accessibility to the medication for both cisgender and transgender individuals.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that it targets and endangers vulnerable trans women. They characterize the petition as a form of bullying and harassment that enables cruelty against a marginalized group.