Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

The commenter, identifying as a social work professional, opposes the petition on the grounds that it is based on bigotry and misunderstanding. They argue that hormone replacement therapy is not a communicable disease and that the petition puts transgender people in danger.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that adding warnings or registries for the medication is unnecessary, violates privacy, and could lead to restricted access that increases suicide risks. They advocate for maintaining accessibility to the medication for both cisgender and transgender individuals.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, arguing that it targets and endangers vulnerable trans women. They characterize the petition as a form of bullying and harassment that enables cruelty against a marginalized group.

The commenter, identifying as a gay man, opposes the proposed action because it increases surveillance and scrutiny on transgender individuals. They argue that the proposal's claims about the negative effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) contradict the positive experiences of those who transition and highlight the systemic biases already faced by the community.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition by Lauren H. Schwartz et al., arguing that it infringes on medical autonomy and privacy while potentially leading to the criminalization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). They also criticize the website's transparency regarding the number of comments received.