Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements

A local gun dealer opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will harm small shops by favoring large online retailers and removing the ability for dealers to perform face-to-face safety assessments. The commenter requests that the direct-shipping provisions for standard firearms be removed.

An FFL (Federal Firearms Licensee) opposes the proposed changes to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements. The commenter argues that the changes would hinder the detection of straw purchases, favor large retailers with significant infrastructure, and create security risks regarding delivery reliability and theft.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and removing face-to-face interactions. They argue that the rule lacks sufficient human oversight and request the removal of the provisions allowing direct shipping of standard firearms.

A shop owner in New York opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will harm small businesses by favoring large online firms and imposing unnecessary fees on buyers. The commenter requests that the direct shipping rules for standard firearms be struck from the plan.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and reducing in-person oversight. They argue that the new direct-shipping provisions lack sufficient oversight and request that these provisions be struck from the final rule.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it is a waste of ATF resources and will harm firearms retailers. They suggest the agency should instead focus on fixing the NFA division, improving eforms, and addressing issues regarding state access to the NICS system.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it removes the requirement for government approval on NFA transfers and replaces it with a passive waiting period. They express concern that the rule will harm local gun shops, increase costs for buyers, and create inconvenience compared to current standards.

Sports, Inc., a national buying group for independent firearms dealers, opposes the proposed rule to eliminate restrictions against non-over-the-counter firearms transfers to unlicensed persons. They argue that the change would jeopardize the integrity of the firearms industry, harm local businesses, and increase the risk of illegal purchases.

The commenter, representing a small brick-and-mortar gun shop, opposes the rule because it allows direct shipping of firearms to homes. They argue this will hurt local businesses, reduce face-to-face safety checks, and increase the risk of straw buys.

The commenter opposes the proposed changes, arguing that allowing direct shipping of standard firearms will harm local gun shops and favor large online retailers. They express concern that automated checks will replace human judgment and lead to the disappearance of community stores.