Everytown for Gun Safety
AdvocacyOppose
Preservation of in-person transactions
Online retail safety limitations
Remote and online firearm transfers
Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
ATF-2026-0266-0001NPRM
Comments
2,184
Last activity Aug 3, 2026
Deadline
3 days
Closes Aug 7, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-76%
-76% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09157
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 2,181 of 2,184 comments
100%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
-76%
Net support
Support250Oppose1,898Other33Not yet analyzed3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -76% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Business
157
Individual
1,994
Government
2
Trade association
1
Advocacy
9
Other
18
Not yet analyzed
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted May 8, 2026Deadline Aug 7, 2026
May 4May 18Jun 1Jun 15Jun 29Jul 13Jul 27Aug 3
Support250Oppose1,898Other33
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
12%
87%
1%
Business
7%
89%
4%
Other
0%
89%
11%
Advocacy
11%
89%
0%
Government
50%
50%
0%
Trade association
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Preservation of in-person transactions1,155
Modernization of notc transfers1,061
Online retail safety limitations1,003
Gun control and safety378
Economic impact on small businesses280
Economic impact on small ffls274
Remote and online firearm transfers213
Chain of custody and straw purchases191
Straw purchases and public safety177
Remote identity verification128
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
2 organizations filed this week — visible to subscribers.
| Organization | Preservation of in-person transactions | Online retail safety limitations | Remote and online firearm transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
Everytown for Gun Safety AdvocacyOppose Everytown for Gun Safety opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales without in | |||
Texas Underground Armory BusinessOppose A federally licensed firearms dealer opposes the proposed expansion of non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearm transfers. | · | · |
Texas Underground Armory
BusinessOppose
Preservation of in-person transactions
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- 7 comments from the past week
7 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 23, 2026Deerfield Pistol RangeOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Kopter SupplyOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed revision to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements, arguing that it will lead to gunstore closures and remove valuable local safety training and screening. They express concern that relying on the ATF for screening will increase mistakes and endanger communities.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Big Boyz GunsOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 2, 2026CrashmecrazyOpposeIndividual
Niko opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will weaken background check systems and increase public safety risks. The commenter expresses concern that the rule will allow firearms to reach criminals, traffickers, and underage children.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Meredith DartOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it allows for too many remote and online firearm sales while sidelining Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). The commenter suggests that the rule undermines public safety and calls for its complete withdrawal.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Jennifer LoganOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Samantha FarrarOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Mary RohanOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed revision to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements, arguing that allowing guns to be shipped by mail will lead to an increase in deadly outcomes and a loss of government responsibility.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →