Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it replaces fingerprint checks with a "weak" video call and notice system, which they argue will harm local gun shops and favor large online retailers. They specifically request that the sections allowing direct shipping of standard guns be struck from the final rule.

An FFL (Federal Firearms Licensee) opposes the proposed changes to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements. The commenter argues that the changes would hinder the detection of straw purchases, favor large retailers with significant infrastructure, and create security risks regarding delivery reliability and theft.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and removing face-to-face interactions. They argue that the rule lacks sufficient human oversight and request the removal of the provisions allowing direct shipping of standard firearms.

A shop owner in New York opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will harm small businesses by favoring large online firms and imposing unnecessary fees on buyers. The commenter requests that the direct shipping rules for standard firearms be struck from the plan.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and reducing in-person oversight. They argue that the new direct-shipping provisions lack sufficient oversight and request that these provisions be struck from the final rule.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it removes the requirement for government approval on NFA transfers and replaces it with a passive waiting period. They express concern that the rule will harm local gun shops, increase costs for buyers, and create inconvenience compared to current standards.

Sports, Inc., a national buying group for independent firearms dealers, opposes the proposed rule to eliminate restrictions against non-over-the-counter firearms transfers to unlicensed persons. They argue that the change would jeopardize the integrity of the firearms industry, harm local businesses, and increase the risk of illegal purchases.

The commenter, representing a small brick-and-mortar gun shop, opposes the rule because it allows direct shipping of firearms to homes. They argue this will hurt local businesses, reduce face-to-face safety checks, and increase the risk of straw buys.

The commenter, representing a federally licensed firearms retailer and shooting range, opposes the proposal to allow direct shipping of firearms to purchasers without an in-person transfer. They argue that face-to-face interactions allow for professional judgment and identity verification that remote systems cannot replicate, and they express concern that the rule would disproportionately harm small local businesses.

The commenter opposes the proposed changes, arguing that allowing direct shipping of standard firearms will harm local gun shops and favor large online retailers. They express concern that automated checks will replace human judgment and lead to the disappearance of community stores.