Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09157
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Preservation of in-person transactions | Online retail safety limitations | Remote and online firearm transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
Everytown for Gun Safety AdvocacyOppose Everytown for Gun Safety opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales without in | |||
Texas Underground Armory BusinessOppose A federally licensed firearms dealer opposes the proposed expansion of non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearm transfers. | · | · |
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 10 comments from the past week
10 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 14, 2026Marylanders to Prevent Gun ViolenceOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2026Everytown for Gun SafetyOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2026Aggie Perilli Communications InternationalOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Terriann MohideenOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue prevents Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) from identifying suspicious behavior or warning signs of potential violence. They believe the rule undermines the role of FFLs as a "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Roxana AranaOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or individuals in crisis. They believe that in-person interactions are necessary for FFLs to serve as an effective first line of defense against firearms trafficking.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Julia LunardoOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe that allowing fully remote and online firearm sales removes the ability of gun dealers to identify suspicious behavior or individuals in crisis. They argue that in-person interactions are a critical component of preventing gun violence and that the rule would make it harder for responsible dealers to exercise their judgment.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Damya OllivierreOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Toni MillerOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Jude GutowskiOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it facilitates remote and online firearm sales, which they argue makes it harder for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to identify suspicious behavior or signs of crisis in customers. They believe that in-person interactions are essential for FFLs to serve as an effective "first line of defense" against firearms trafficking and gun violence.
Read comment →
