Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09157
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Preservation of in-person transactions | Online retail safety limitations | Remote and online firearm transfers |
|---|---|---|---|
Everytown for Gun Safety AdvocacyOppose Everytown for Gun Safety opposes the proposed rule because it allows for more remote and online firearm sales without in | |||
Texas Underground Armory BusinessOppose A federally licensed firearms dealer opposes the proposed expansion of non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearm transfers. | · | · |
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 25, 2026Texas Underground ArmoryOpposeBusiness
A federally licensed firearms dealer opposes the proposed expansion of non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearm transfers. The commenter argues that face-to-face interactions are essential for dealers to exercise professional judgment in identifying straw purchases and trafficking, which remote transactions cannot replicate.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026THE HUNTERS TRADING POST LLCOpposeBusinessRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026First Strike MunitionsSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026BELLSHIRE HARDWARE CO. INC.OpposeBusiness
An FFL dealer with over 40 years of experience opposes the proposed revisions, arguing that they will facilitate straw purchases and criminal activity while creating a monopoly for large retailers. The commenter asserts that the current system is effective and that the proposed changes would undermine existing law enforcement cooperation.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026East Valley TacticalOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it increases the risk of straw purchases and public safety threats. They argue that requiring transfers through gun shops provides a necessary layer of scrutiny that direct delivery lacks.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026tri- state jewelry & loan llcOpposeBusiness
Richard Blakeman, owner of Classic Jewelry & Loan Barboursville, opposes the proposed rule because he believes it will make it easier for criminals to obtain firearms. He argues that the rule will undermine the ability of local dealers to vet customers and could lead to increased crime and firearm confiscation.
Read comment → - Jul 10, 2026Arego's gunsOpposeBusinessRead comment →
- Jul 9, 20263D CustomsOpposeBusiness
The commenter, identifying as a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL), opposes the proposed revisions because they believe the rules will not effectively prevent straw purchases and will instead place an undue regulatory burden on law-abiding citizens and FFLs. They argue that the current systems are already overwhelmed and that new requirements will not solve the underlying issues.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026Guns N Gear Sports LLCOpposeBusiness
The owner of Guns N Gear Sports LLC, a federally licensed firearms dealer, opposes the proposed revisions because they would expand non-over-the-counter firearms transactions and remove the critical in-person identity verification provided by licensed dealers. The commenter argues that a direct-to-home shipping model would increase illegal firearms and fraud by eliminating the human element of professional judgment at retail locations.
Read comment → - Jul 2, 2026CrashmecrazyOpposeIndividual
Niko opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will weaken background check systems and increase public safety risks. The commenter expresses concern that the rule will allow firearms to reach criminals, traffickers, and underage children.
Read comment →
