Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
- Posted
- Jul 6, 2023
- Comment period
- Jul 6, 2023 – Sep 6, 2023
- FR Doc
- 2023-13622
- CFR
- 49 CFR Parts 571 and 596
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 11, 2023Tammy HusmanOpposeIndividual
A livestock hauler opposes the proposed automatic emergency braking requirements, arguing that sudden braking can cause dangerous load shifts and increase the risk of rollover accidents. The commenter suggests that the technology undermines driver skill and advocates for improved driver training instead of new regulations.
Read comment → - Aug 5, 2023Linda WhittleOpposeIndividual
The commenter, who appears to be a truck delivery driver, argues that heavy vehicle automatic emergency braking systems are dangerous and prone to malfunctioning. They claim the systems cause skidding and safety hazards in various driving conditions and advocate for them to be outlawed until perfected.
Read comment → - Aug 4, 2023Arline SprauOpposeIndividual
A commercial truck driver argues that mandating automatic emergency braking systems is dangerous because the technology frequently triggers "false positives" due to shadows, debris, and construction barriers. The commenter claims these malfunctions create safety hazards for other drivers and disrupt the supply chain, asserting that the technology is not ready for real-world use in heavy vehicles.
Read comment → - Jul 25, 2023William MuirOpposeIndividual
A commercial truck driver with over 23 years of experience argues that automatic emergency braking systems are dangerous and can create unsafe situations by reacting to shadows or terrain. The commenter suggests that the government should focus on improving driver training and skill rating programs instead of implementing these automated systems.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2023Haywood WrightOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 13, 2023Paul McEachernOpposeIndividual
A master automobile and heavy duty truck technician and CDL driver opposes the rule because it fails to include requirements for Electronic Brake Signaling (EBS). The commenter argues that the lack of EBS in the rule is a significant safety oversight that prevents faster brake response times and more effective Automatic Emergency Braking systems.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2023Kevin JonesOpposeIndividual
A truck driver who operates heavy vehicles argues that the proposed automatic emergency braking equipment is dangerous and prone to false activations. They cite specific instances where the system caused the vehicle to slam on the brakes unnecessarily near overpasses and construction barriers, potentially leading to serious accidents.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2023Edward ParkerOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 12, 2023Mickey HartleyOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Mickey, a long-time truck driver, opposes the implementation of automatic emergency braking systems, arguing that the focus should be on proper driver training and accountability for carriers instead of machine intervention. He expresses concern that these regulations represent government overreach and will negatively impact the livelihoods of independent drivers.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2023RICHARD A NARDONEOpposeIndividual
The commenter, likely a truck owner/operator, opposes the requirement for heavy vehicle automatic emergency braking systems. They argue that these systems can cause accidents by causing sudden braking that vehicles without ABS cannot handle, and they express concern over the high costs of the equipment and installation.
Read comment →
