Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
- Posted
- Jul 6, 2023
- Comment period
- Jul 6, 2023 – Sep 6, 2023
- FR Doc
- 2023-13622
- CFR
- 49 CFR Parts 571 and 596
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 14, 2023Carrie AtencioOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 11, 2023Stephen DonaldsonOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 4, 2023Gayl RussellOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 12, 2023Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A truck driver opposes the mandate for Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems, citing personal experience where the device malfunctioned and nearly caused a crash. The commenter argues that the government should focus on improving driver education, enforcing existing laws, and requiring better communication tools like CB radios instead of adding more regulations.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2023Mickey HartleyOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
Mickey, a long-time truck driver, opposes the implementation of automatic emergency braking systems, arguing that the focus should be on proper driver training and accountability for carriers instead of machine intervention. He expresses concern that these regulations represent government overreach and will negatively impact the livelihoods of independent drivers.
Read comment →
