Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Automatic Emergency Braking Test Devices: Heavy Vehicle Automatic Emergency Braking
- Posted
- Jul 6, 2023
- Comment period
- Jul 6, 2023 – Sep 6, 2023
- FR Doc
- 2023-13622
- CFR
- 49 CFR Parts 571 and 596
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 21, 2026Richard GordonSupportIndividual
A former truck driver argues that the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) system in certain heavy vehicles is unsafe because it causes the truck to lock up. The commenter supports disabling the device as the only way to ensure safe operation of the vehicle.
Read comment → - Aug 14, 2023Emmanuel DiazOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 13, 2023Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A commercial truck driver with over 30 years of experience argues that automatic emergency braking devices are dangerous and prone to "ghost" braking. The commenter claims these systems can cause accidents, such as tractor jackknifing, and exert excessive physical force on the driver.
Read comment → - Aug 11, 2023Mindaugas PipirasOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 4, 2023John ThomasOpposeIndividual
A truck driver expresses concern that the proposed automatic emergency braking system for heavy vehicles could cause dangerous accidents. They argue that the system may trigger unexpectedly on objects like bridges or guardrails, potentially causing heavy trucks to lock up and lose control in traffic.
Read comment → - Jul 30, 2023Paul McEachernOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's information regarding heavy trailers and AEB systems is "grossly deficient." They argue that the proposal fails to account for the technical requirements of braking on trailing axles and suggests that mandating Electronic Brake Signaling (EBS) would be a more effective safety measure.
Read comment → - Jul 26, 2023Paul McEachernOpposeIndividual
The commenter, a master automobile and heavy duty truck mechanic, argues that the proposed rulemaking fails to address the underlying technological deficiencies in heavy vehicle braking systems, such as the lack of Electronic Brake Signaling (EBS). They contend that the rule is insufficient because it does not require the modernization of antiquated pneumatic brake control valves, which are critical for effective Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) performance.
Read comment → - Jul 13, 2023Paul McEachernOpposeIndividual
A master automobile and heavy duty truck technician and CDL driver opposes the rule because it fails to include requirements for Electronic Brake Signaling (EBS). The commenter argues that the lack of EBS in the rule is a significant safety oversight that prevents faster brake response times and more effective Automatic Emergency Braking systems.
Read comment →
