Revising Non-Over-the-Counter Firearms Transaction Requirements

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it replaces fingerprint checks with a "weak" video call and notice system, which they argue will harm local gun shops and favor large online retailers. They specifically request that the sections allowing direct shipping of standard guns be struck from the final rule.

A small home-based Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) supports the proposed rule for non-over-the-counter firearm transactions as it provides more freedom and convenience for dealers and purchasers. However, the commenter expresses concern regarding how the rule interacts with state-specific point-of-contact requirements, particularly in Virginia, and requests further clarification and coordination with states.

A federally licensed firearms dealer opposes the proposed expansion of non-over-the-counter (NOTC) firearm transfers. The commenter argues that face-to-face interactions are essential for dealers to exercise professional judgment in identifying straw purchases and trafficking, which remote transactions cannot replicate.

An FFL (Federal Firearms Licensee) opposes the proposed changes to non-over-the-counter firearms transaction requirements. The commenter argues that the changes would hinder the detection of straw purchases, favor large retailers with significant infrastructure, and create security risks regarding delivery reliability and theft.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and removing face-to-face interactions. They argue that the rule lacks sufficient human oversight and request the removal of the provisions allowing direct shipping of standard firearms.

The commenter, representing a small firearm business, opposes the proposed revision because it removes the face-to-face interaction necessary to vet transactions and prevent straw purchases. They argue the change will create regulatory confusion in certain states and negatively impact foot traffic and sales.

A shop owner in New York opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it will harm small businesses by favoring large online firms and imposing unnecessary fees on buyers. The commenter requests that the direct shipping rules for standard firearms be struck from the plan.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it will harm local gun shops by favoring large online retailers and reducing in-person oversight. They argue that the new direct-shipping provisions lack sufficient oversight and request that these provisions be struck from the final rule.