Selecting Biological Sex on ATF Forms

The commenter opposes the rule, arguing that it is a discriminatory overreach of federal power that does not improve public safety. They suggest the ATF should instead focus on regulating 3D-printed firearms and suppressors.

A Wisconsin resident opposes the proposed rule change, arguing that requiring the selection of biological sex on ATF forms violates rights to self-expression and disenfranchises non-binary individuals. The commenter characterizes the action as unconstitutional overreach.

The commenter opposes the rule change, arguing that it infringes upon constitutional rights, privacy, and bodily autonomy. They question the practical enforcement of the rule and view it as an overreach of government power.

The commenter, identifying as a lifelong Second Amendment proponent and gun owner, opposes the proposed action. They argue that the requirement to select biological sex on ATF forms is a violation of the Second Amendment and an attempt to target and disarm specific ideological and religious groups.

A transgender veteran opposes the proposed action, arguing that the government should respect individual identities and rights. The commenter emphasizes that all humans are equal and calls for the government to stop "betraying" veterans.