Selecting Biological Sex on ATF Forms

The commenter opposes the proposed rulemaking, arguing that it creates operational conflicts for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), imposes excessive compliance costs, and violates constitutional and civil rights. They specifically highlight concerns regarding the lack of statutory authority, potential perjury traps, and the need for a more reasonable implementation period for transgender Americans.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule requiring "biological sex at birth" on firearms purchase forms, arguing it conflicts with state sovereignty and legal birth certificate amendments. They request the ATF withdraw the proposal to avoid legal inconsistencies and the arbitrary denial of firearm rights.

The commenter opposes the proposal to select biological sex on ATF forms, arguing that it is an overreach of authority that does not contribute to the ATF's mission of public safety. They contend that the agency lacks the authority to adjudicate sex and that the collection of this data is a waste of resources.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it lacks a clear statutory basis, provides no public safety benefit, and imposes unnecessary costs and privacy intrusions. They contend that the regulation expands administrative authority beyond the ATF's core mission and violates various executive orders and judicial precedents.

The commenter opposes the proposal to require the disclosure of biological sex on ATF forms, arguing that it constitutes an overreach of agency authority and lacks a demonstrated public safety benefit. They contend that the regulation is not supported by statutory authority, violates various Executive Orders, and fails to provide a reasoned explanation for its necessity.

The commenter opposes the proposed change to ATF forms regarding biological sex, arguing that it creates undue hardship for individuals who have legally changed their sex. They also express concern that the change prioritizes executive orders over state court orders.

The commenter, identifying as a cis woman, supports the action of selecting biological sex on ATF forms. She argues that maintaining a clear definition of "woman" is necessary for women's safety and the protection of Second Amendment rights.