Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
- Posted
- Mar 12, 2025
- Comment period
- Mar 12, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ai in medical practice | Algorithmic bias in healthcare | Narxcare regulation |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 24, 2026Comment from J CasperOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it removes individualization from patient care and relies on statistics that do not align with medical science. They express concerns that the scoring system creates a false sense of risk for providers and advocate for patients to have access to their own score information.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from Ralph MaddoxOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the implementation of a numerical score for pain management, arguing that it is unregulated, violates HIPAA, and causes harm to chronic pain patients. They request that the agency stop the use of these scores.
Read comment → - Apr 9, 2026Comment from Constance SanfordOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Feb 13, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
A patient suffering from chronic pain argues that the proposed action regarding Narc Care and PDMD violates HIPAA privacy rights and leads to discrimination against disabled individuals. The commenter requests that the government stop judging patients and allow them to manage their conditions without being dismissed by medical professionals.
Read comment → - Feb 12, 2026Comment from Amy DuncanOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues that government involvement in medical decision-making, specifically regarding chronic pain management and the DEA's role, constitutes a violation of constitutional rights and an act of tyranny. They demand complete transparency and believe the government has no right to interfere in the private relationship between patients and their healthcare providers.
Read comment → - Feb 8, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A private individual opposes the use of AI and government guidelines to determine pain medication dosages. The commenter argues that medical decisions regarding chronic pain should be made solely between the patient and their doctor based on updated clinical guidelines.
Read comment → - Feb 7, 2026Comment from Joon BugOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues against the implementation of a computerized scoring system to alert prescribers or pharmacists about patient medications. They contend that individual patient needs and physician knowledge should take precedence over automated scores, which they believe could lead to biased care and reduced treatment options.
Read comment → - Feb 7, 2026Comment from Joon BugOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues against the implementation of a computerized scoring system to alert prescribers or pharmacists about patient medications. They contend that individual patient needs and physician knowledge should take precedence over automated scores, which they believe could lead to biased care and reduced treatment options.
Read comment → - Feb 4, 2026Comment from Monika DixonSupportAdvocacyRead comment →
- Feb 4, 2026Comment from Monika DixonSupportAdvocacyRead comment →
