Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
- Posted
- Mar 12, 2025
- Comment period
- Mar 12, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ai in medical practice | Algorithmic bias in healthcare | Narxcare regulation |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- May 25, 2026Comment from K PSupportAdvocacy
The Doctor Patient Forum supports the citizen petition to regulate or abolish the NarxCare system. They argue that the system lacks transparency, violates patient rights, and negatively impacts the ability of healthcare providers to deliver effective care.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, speaking as a representative of the chronically ill and pain patients, supports the petition by highlighting the suffering of patients who lack access to pain management. They argue that current regulations are discriminatory and push vulnerable people toward dangerous alternatives like overdose or suicide.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Beverly C. Schechtman, representing The Doctor Patient Forum, submits a citizen petition requesting that the FDA regulate NarxCare as a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). The organization argues that NarxCare's risk-scoring algorithms lack transparency and clinical validation, leading to patient harm and restricted access to necessary medications.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from CP ShorttSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to regulate NarxCare as a "Software as a Device" to ensure transparency and oversight. They argue that the current proprietary algorithm used to deny pain medications lacks clinical input and creates risks of malpractice.
Read comment → - Apr 30, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, a patient, argues that the Narxcare algorithm is causing physical and emotional harm by incorrectly penalizing patients for pharmacy stock issues. They urge the FDA to stop the use of this software, claiming it is a "barbaric algorithm" that endangers patient health.
Read comment → - Mar 26, 2026Comment from Robert PeckSupportIndividual
An individual supports the petition because they are concerned that algorithms and scoring systems may lead to impersonal and potentially harmful healthcare decisions. They argue that medical care should prioritize human judgment and individualized attention over data-driven systems that lack transparency.
Read comment → - Mar 26, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter expresses concern regarding potential biases and the lack of transparency regarding certain healthcare entities and treatments. They argue that the current situation could prevent access to "Gold Standard" treatments and advocate for a closer look into issues like shortages and forced tapers.
Read comment → - Feb 19, 2026Comment from Mark Ibsen MDSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Feb 12, 2026Comment from Desirae hopperSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to regulate NarxCare as a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD). They argue that unregulated risk-scoring algorithms can negatively impact patient care and that FDA oversight is necessary to ensure safety, transparency, and clinical validation.
Read comment → - Feb 9, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual patient expresses concern that an AI-generated risk score (Narx score) could unfairly bias medical treatment for patients on controlled medications. They also raise concerns regarding HIPAA privacy violations and the lack of nuance in how the algorithm accounts for specific medical histories.
Read comment →
