Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
- Posted
- Mar 12, 2025
- Comment period
- Mar 12, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ai in medical practice | Algorithmic bias in healthcare | Narxcare regulation |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 6, 2026Comment from Tania CortesSupportIndividual
The commenter, a patient suffering from chronic pain and various medical complications, expresses deep frustration with the current healthcare system and pharmaceutical practices. They support the petition by detailing their negative experiences with "useless" pain interventions, medication side effects, and perceived patient abandonment by medical professionals and pharmacists.
Read comment → - May 25, 2026Comment from K PSupportAdvocacy
The Doctor Patient Forum supports the citizen petition to regulate or abolish the NarxCare system. They argue that the system lacks transparency, violates patient rights, and negatively impacts the ability of healthcare providers to deliver effective care.
Read comment → - May 24, 2026Comment from Deborah TylerOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the use of prescription monitoring programs and the sharing of medical records, arguing that these actions violate HIPAA rights and destroy the trust between patients and doctors. They claim that such government oversight discourages people from seeking necessary medical treatment and leads to negative health outcomes.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- May 23, 2026Comment from Heather LaRossaSupportIndividual
The commenter, a patient seeking pain management, expresses frustration with being treated as a "high risk" drug addict by their medical provider despite reducing their medication. They support the petition by highlighting their negative experience with current medical oversight and the perceived defamation of their character.
Read comment → - May 8, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Apr 18, 2026Comment from Michelle MylottOpposeIndividual
A patient advocate expresses concern that an unregulated database could be used to arbitrarily deny medical care to vulnerable individuals. They argue that any database with the power to make life-changing decisions must be subject to regulation and that independent companies should not hold such authority.
Read comment → - Apr 14, 2026Comment from Kristi BainsSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the petition to stop punishing patients based on subjective opinions from healthcare providers. They argue that the current grading system is unfair and advocate for a regulated process that allows patients to see detailed records and dispute scores without negative consequences.
Read comment → - Apr 9, 2026Comment from Constance SanfordOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Mar 27, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter argues that healthcare providers are withholding information from patients and that government surveillance of patient records must end. They advocate for intense governmental supervision of Narxcare and Bamboo to protect patient rights and ensure accuracy in medical records.
Read comment →
