Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from The Doctor Patient Forum
- Posted
- Mar 12, 2025
- Comment period
- Mar 12, 2025 – ?
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Ai in medical practice | Algorithmic bias in healthcare | Narxcare regulation |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jun 6, 2026Comment from Tania CortesSupportIndividual
The commenter, a patient suffering from chronic pain and various medical complications, expresses deep frustration with the current healthcare system and pharmaceutical practices. They support the petition by detailing their negative experiences with "useless" pain interventions, medication side effects, and perceived patient abandonment by medical professionals and pharmacists.
Read comment → - Jun 4, 2026Comment from E HarstonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 27, 2026Comment from Linda NiebrzydoskiOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- May 25, 2026Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter, a chronic pain patient, opposes the proposed action because it groups chronic pain sufferers with drug addicts. They argue that the plan causes "barbaric suffering" for patients with legitimate medical needs and find the categorization insulting.
Read comment → - May 25, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, representing a chronic pain patient, supports the petition to make opioid pain medications more accessible. They argue that current regulations are causing patients to be abandoned by doctors and forced into suffering by losing access to necessary medications.
Read comment → - May 25, 2026Comment from Deborah MayoSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed action to stop Narxcare and reduce DEA involvement in patient treatment. They argue that the current system unfairly penalizes elderly patients with real medical issues and advocate for more compassion in medical care.
Read comment → - May 24, 2026Comment from Deborah TylerOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the use of prescription monitoring programs and the sharing of medical records, arguing that these actions violate HIPAA rights and destroy the trust between patients and doctors. They claim that such government oversight discourages people from seeking necessary medical treatment and leads to negative health outcomes.
Read comment → - May 24, 2026Comment from Rhonda MillerSupportIndividualRead comment →
- May 23, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, speaking as a representative of the chronically ill and pain patients, supports the petition by highlighting the suffering of patients who lack access to pain management. They argue that current regulations are discriminatory and push vulnerable people toward dangerous alternatives like overdose or suicide.
Read comment → - May 23, 2026Comment from Ralph MaddoxOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the implementation of a numerical score for pain management, arguing that it is unregulated, violates HIPAA, and causes harm to chronic pain patients. They request that the agency stop the use of these scores.
Read comment →
