The commenter, identifying as a tax-paying voter, opposes the proposed action to stop the collection of EEOC data. They argue that diversity and inclusion are essential to American society and that maintaining data collection is necessary to ensure fair representation and track progress.

The commenter opposes the proposed rescinding of EEO-1 through EEO-6 reporting requirements. They argue that this data is essential for tracking representation disparities and verifying corporate claims regarding diversity.

A private individual opposes the removal of information regarding equal opportunity discrepancies. They argue that such data provides necessary visibility into systemic barriers faced by certain groups in the technical marketplace.

Robert J. Thornton, a professor at Lehigh University, opposes the proposed discontinuation of the EEO-1 data series, arguing that it is a unique and irreplaceable source for labor economics research. He highlights the significant research costs associated with data discontinuities and suggests that the Commission should explore alternative methods for data protection rather than ending the collection.

The commenter opposes the proposal to eliminate the EEOC's collection of racial demographic information. They argue that such data is essential for identifying disparities, ensuring accountability, and making evidence-based decisions to promote true equity in employment.

Donald Tomaskovic-Devey of the Center for Employment Equity at the University of Massachusetts opposes ending EEOC workplace data collection. He argues that this data is essential for tracking progress toward an equal opportunity society and understanding the processes that affect it.