The commenter supports the EEOC's position on mandatory, proactive demographic data collection, arguing that it is a neutral and essential tool for identifying systemic discrimination. They contend that such data collection does not violate Equal Protection rights and that the public benefit of transparency outweighs the minimal administrative costs to employers.

The commenter, a healthcare professional and Legal Nurse Consultant, opposes the removal of the EEO-1 reporting requirement. They argue that the data is essential for identifying systemic discrimination, providing transparency, and informing evidence-based enforcement of civil rights laws.

The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law supports the EEOC's proposal to rescind demographic reporting requirements, arguing that enforcement should focus on individualized discrimination rather than statistical balancing. However, they urge the Commission to ensure that this move does not lead to diminished attention toward anti-Semitism, which often goes unrecognized in aggregate demographic data.

Emily Best, Founder and CEO of Seed&Spark, opposes the proposed rule to eliminate EEO-1 through EEO-6 reporting and recordkeeping requirements. She argues that this data is essential for holding the entertainment industry accountable for diversity and ensuring that the demographics of storytellers reflect the actual American audience.

The commenter opposes the EEOC's proposal to rescind EEO-1 reporting requirements, arguing that these reports are essential evidence-based tools for identifying systemic discrimination. They contend that the data is vital for both enforcement actions and academic research, and that the agency's rationale for rescinding them is flawed and would undermine the mission of equal opportunity.

The commenter, identifying as a graduate student, opposes the proposed rescission of EEO reporting requirements. They argue that the data is essential for identifying patterns of discrimination, serves as a vital longitudinal resource for researchers, and that removing the federal requirement will lead to fragmented and inconsistent state-level reporting.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule to eliminate workforce demographic data reporting requirements. They argue that such data is essential for identifying discrimination, ensuring transparency, and upholding civil rights laws.

The commenter opposes the removal of the Reporting Requirements program, arguing that employer demographic data collection is essential for the EEOC to protect workers from discrimination. They emphasize that these requirements are vital for ensuring workplace equality and achieving the American dream.