The commenter, a healthcare professional and Legal Nurse Consultant, opposes the removal of the EEO-1 reporting requirement. They argue that the data is essential for identifying systemic discrimination, providing transparency, and informing evidence-based enforcement of civil rights laws.

The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law supports the EEOC's proposal to rescind demographic reporting requirements, arguing that enforcement should focus on individualized discrimination rather than statistical balancing. However, they urge the Commission to ensure that this move does not lead to diminished attention toward anti-Semitism, which often goes unrecognized in aggregate demographic data.

Christopher Day expresses strong personal feelings regarding workplace discrimination and antisemitism, but his comment is largely a personal declaration and does not take a clear position on the specific proposed action. He mentions a personal website and religious sentiments without providing specific feedback on the regulatory document.

The commenter opposes the EEOC's proposal to rescind EEO-1 reporting requirements, arguing that these reports are essential evidence-based tools for identifying systemic discrimination. They contend that the data is vital for both enforcement actions and academic research, and that the agency's rationale for rescinding them is flawed and would undermine the mission of equal opportunity.

The commenter opposes the removal of the Reporting Requirements program, arguing that employer demographic data collection is essential for the EEOC to protect workers from discrimination. They emphasize that these requirements are vital for ensuring workplace equality and achieving the American dream.

The commenter supports the EEOC's proposal to rescind the EEO-1 report to reduce administrative burdens and redirect resources toward investigating hiring discrimination. They request that the final rule include binding commitments to redirect the saved funds, establish measurable targets for litigation, and include mandatory enforcement mechanisms for job seekers.

JenqYann Ku, representing the 80-20 Educational Foundation, opposes Proposed Rule RIN 3046-AB37. The commenter argues that EEO-1 data is necessary to monitor and address the "bamboo ceiling" facing Asian Americans in high-tech industries.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule to eliminate the collection and reporting of demographic data by employers. They argue that this data is essential for identifying disparate impact and systemic discrimination, and that removing it undermines the EEOC's legal mandate.