The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law
AdvocacySupport
Employer reporting requirements
EEOC-2026-0034-0001
Comments
929
Last activity Aug 7, 2026
Deadline
--
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-90%
-90% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 897 of 929 comments
97%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
-90%
Net support
Support39Oppose844Other14Not yet analyzed32
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -90% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Academic
13
Business
8
Individual
852
Government
2
Advocacy
18
Other
4
Not yet analyzed
32
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Jul 20Jul 27Aug 3
Support39Oppose844Other14
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
4%
95%
1%
Advocacy
28%
61%
11%
Academic
0%
92%
8%
Business
13%
88%
0%
Other
0%
100%
0%
Government
0%
100%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
11 organizations filed this week — visible to subscribers.
| Organization | Employer reporting requirements |
|---|---|
The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law AdvocacySupport The Louis D. |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.