Selecting Biological Sex on ATF Forms

Operation Blazing Sword, Inc. (specifically its Pink Pistols division) opposes the ATF's directive requiring firearm purchasers to identify by biological sex on Form 4473. They argue that the requirement creates a "Catch-22" for transgender and non-binary individuals, potentially leading to legal complications and disenfranchising a minority group from exercising their Second Amendment rights.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it serves no regulatory purpose and creates unnecessary red tape. They claim the rule is a discriminatory measure that does not improve the ATF's ability to identify individuals.

The commenter opposes the rule, arguing that it is a discriminatory overreach of federal power that does not improve public safety. They suggest the ATF should instead focus on regulating 3D-printed firearms and suppressors.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule changes regarding selecting biological sex on ATF forms, arguing that the requirements create unnecessary government regulation. They contend that the rule would force transgender citizens to misrepresent themselves and would unconstitutionally abridge their Second Amendment rights.

Justin Bradford opposes the proposed rule to restrict sex and gender markers to biological sex on ATF forms. He argues that the rule will cause administrative confusion due to discrepancies with state-issued IDs and constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy.