Citizen Petition from Lauren H. Schwartz, et al.

A parent supports the citizen petition and requests a public hearing for transparent scientific debate, a comprehensive safety review and REMS evaluation, and the development of communications for medical providers regarding safeguards.

The commenter opposes the citizen petition, characterizing it as a misrepresentation of scientific data and an attempt to penalize transgender women. They argue that estrogen is a standard medication that should be treated as such.

The commenter, identifying as a social work professional, opposes the petition on the grounds that it is based on bigotry and misunderstanding. They argue that hormone replacement therapy is not a communicable disease and that the petition puts transgender people in danger.

A parent supports the petition and requests mandatory boxed warnings, public hearings, and comprehensive safety reviews for gender-affirming medications. The commenter shares a personal account of their son's health and mental decline after beginning estrogen treatment without specialized medical evaluation.

The commenter, identifying as a parent, supports the citizen petition and requests specific regulatory actions including mandatory boxed warnings, public hearings, safety reviews, and enhanced adverse event reporting.

Lauren H. Schwartz, writing as a parent, supports the citizen petition and requests specific safety measures including mandatory boxed warnings, public hearings, and enhanced adverse event reporting.