CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
- Posted
- Jul 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 14, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Rpm staffing requirements | Home modification coverage | Payment adequacy |
|---|---|---|---|
American Association for Elder Care AdvocacySupport The American Association for Elder Care (AAEC) advocates for the inclusion of evidence-based home modifications as a Med | · | · | |
An RPM Vendor BusinessOppose The commenter, an RPM vendor, opposes the proposed requirement that all clinical staff furnishing RPM and RTM services m | · | · | |
Go Medical Billing BusinessOppose Go Medical Billing LLC opposes the proposed conversion factor reduction and same-day payment reductions, arguing they wi | · | · | |
NAVIX Diagnostix BusinessOppose NAVIX Diagnostix, a remote care management company, opposes the proposed restriction that would limit RPM and RTM paymen | · | · | |
Trilogy Health BusinessOppose Trilogy Health opposes the proposal to limit Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RPM/RTM) services to | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A patient expresses opposition to the proposed 2027 CMS rule, citing concerns that it will lead to longer wait times, reduced one-on-one time with doctors, and the potential closure of independent physician practices. The commenter argues that the rule threatens their access to quality care from trusted physicians.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Henry VuceticOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed Medicare payment cuts, arguing that they will reduce access to healthcare providers, increase physician burnout, and further strain the healthcare system. They urge CMS to find alternative ways to save money rather than reducing physician reimbursements.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Kelly ConnerOpposeIndividual
A patient expresses opposition to the proposed 2027 CMS rule, citing concerns that it will lead to longer wait times, reduced one-on-one time with doctors, and potential closures of independent physician practices. The commenter argues that the rule threatens their continued access to quality medical care.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Dr CohenOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed payment policy changes, arguing that the cuts will reduce access to quality care and harm patients. They specifically criticize the role of private equity-owned entities and express concern over the quality of care provided by non-physician practitioners.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
An individual opposes the proposed CY 2027 Payment Policies, arguing that requiring separate visits for evaluations and procedures will lead to longer appointment delays, delayed diagnoses, and increased inconvenience for elderly patients.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Michael FraykorOpposeIndividual
Michael Fraykor, a physician assistant, opposes the proposed payment changes because they may force practices to separate evaluation and treatment into multiple appointments. He argues that this will negatively impact patient access to timely care and hinder the efficient team-based model used in dermatology.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026John KaufmanOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 16, 2026Matthew JohnsonSupportOther
The commenter argues that physical therapists are uniquely qualified to serve as primary care musculoskeletal providers due to their specialized training and education. They advocate for supporting advanced training, standardized credentialing, and evidence-based diagnostic procedures within the physical therapy profession to improve patient access to high-quality care.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Koby HartisOpposeBusiness
An independently owned outpatient physical therapy organization opposes the proposed reduction in the Medicare conversion factor for CY 2027. They argue that the reduction, combined with rising operational costs like payroll and technology, will create a reimbursement cut that threatens the viability of independent and rural clinics.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Sajiv ChandradasOpposeIndividual
A patient expresses concern that the proposed 2027 CMS rule will lead to longer wait times, fewer follow-up visits, and less one-on-one time with doctors. The commenter opposes the rule, fearing it will jeopardize their access to quality care and threaten the viability of independent physician practices.
Read comment →
