American Association for Elder Care
AdvocacySupport
Home modification coverage
CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
CMS-2026-2377-0001NPRM
Comments
73
Last activity Jul 16, 2026
Deadline
Closed on Jul 17, 2026
Closed Jul 17, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-88%
-88% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
- Posted
- Jul 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 14, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026
- Topics
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Stance breakdown
-88%
Net support
Support4Oppose68Other1
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -88% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Academic
1
Business
19
Individual
50
Advocacy
1
Other
2
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jul 14, 2026Deadline Jul 17, 2026
Jul 13
Support4Oppose68Other1
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
0%
98%
2%
Business
11%
89%
0%
Other
50%
50%
0%
Academic
0%
100%
0%
Advocacy
100%
0%
0%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Rpm staffing requirements | Home modification coverage | Payment adequacy |
|---|---|---|---|
American Association for Elder Care AdvocacySupport The American Association for Elder Care (AAEC) advocates for the inclusion of evidence-based home modifications as a Med | · | · | |
An RPM Vendor BusinessOppose The commenter, an RPM vendor, opposes the proposed requirement that all clinical staff furnishing RPM and RTM services m | · | · | |
Go Medical Billing BusinessOppose Go Medical Billing LLC opposes the proposed conversion factor reduction and same-day payment reductions, arguing they wi | · | · | |
NAVIX Diagnostix BusinessOppose NAVIX Diagnostix, a remote care management company, opposes the proposed restriction that would limit RPM and RTM paymen | · | · | |
Trilogy Health BusinessOppose Trilogy Health opposes the proposal to limit Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RPM/RTM) services to | · | · |
An RPM Vendor
BusinessOppose
Rpm staffing requirements
Go Medical Billing
BusinessOppose
Payment adequacy
NAVIX Diagnostix
BusinessOppose
Rpm staffing requirements
Trilogy Health
BusinessOppose
Rpm staffing requirements
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
Filter:
- Jul 15, 2026John HardinOpposeIndividual
A physician is opposing the proposed Physician Fee Schedule, arguing that it will lead to the devaluation of physician services and reduced access to care for Medicare patients. The commenter contends that the cuts will force independent practices to close and allow corporate entities and pharmaceutical companies to further monopolize the healthcare system.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Alan SnyderOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed payment policies, arguing that they will lead to delayed care, increased out-of-pocket costs for patients, and a decline in quality of life. They further contend that the changes will punish private practices and favor private equity-owned practices.
Read comment → - Jul 15, 2026Alan SnyderOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed payment policies, arguing that they will lead to delayed care, increased out-of-pocket costs for patients, and a decline in quality of life. They further contend that the changes will punish private practices and favor private equity-owned practices.
Read comment →