CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- CY 2027 Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P Display)
- Posted
- Jul 14, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 14, 2026 – Jul 17, 2026
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Rpm staffing requirements | Home modification coverage | Payment adequacy |
|---|---|---|---|
American Association for Elder Care AdvocacySupport The American Association for Elder Care (AAEC) advocates for the inclusion of evidence-based home modifications as a Med | · | · | |
An RPM Vendor BusinessOppose The commenter, an RPM vendor, opposes the proposed requirement that all clinical staff furnishing RPM and RTM services m | · | · | |
Go Medical Billing BusinessOppose Go Medical Billing LLC opposes the proposed conversion factor reduction and same-day payment reductions, arguing they wi | · | · | |
NAVIX Diagnostix BusinessOppose NAVIX Diagnostix, a remote care management company, opposes the proposed restriction that would limit RPM and RTM paymen | · | · | |
Trilogy Health BusinessOppose Trilogy Health opposes the proposal to limit Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RPM/RTM) services to | · | · |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 15, 2026Trilogy HealthOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
Trilogy Health opposes the proposal to limit Remote Physiologic and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RPM/RTM) services to clinical staff employed directly by the practice. They argue that the change would restrict access to care for rural and underserved communities, disrupt established compliant programs, and remove a viable delivery model for technology-enabled monitoring.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
The commenter, an RPM vendor, opposes the proposed requirement that all clinical staff furnishing RPM and RTM services must be directly employed by the billing physician practice. They argue the mandate would impose prohibitive costs on small and rural practices, reduce patient access to services, and propose targeted regulatory alternatives to address program integrity concerns without restricting labor-market structures.
Read comment → - Jul 16, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 15, 2026JESSICA PISKEROpposeBusiness📎 Attachment
NAVIX Diagnostix, a remote care management company, opposes the proposed restriction that would limit RPM and RTM payments to services performed by practice employees rather than contractors. They argue that employment status is not a proxy for care quality and that the rule would reduce patient access to these services, particularly in rural and under-resourced settings.
Read comment →
