Interstate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act Firearms

The commenter supports the proposed action to remove the requirement for advance notification of interstate travel with Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs). They argue that because these firearms are already registered under the NFA, the requirement is unnecessary and would simplify life for both owners and law enforcement.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it allows for the transport of dangerous weapons across state lines without notifying local authorities. They express concern that the rule could endanger law enforcement and communities by making it easier for individuals to transport deadly firearms.

James Konsevich opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it would allow individuals to transport deadly firearms across state lines without notifying law enforcement. He expresses concern that the rule would increase public safety risks and endanger law enforcement officers during routine interactions.

The commenter, a former police officer and current NRA instructor, supports the proposed rule. They argue that individuals who have passed background checks should not be treated with suspicion or required to seek permission to travel with legally permitted firearms.

The commenter supports the proposed changes, arguing that they remove unnecessary administrative burdens for both regulators and citizens. They contend that modern technology makes ownership verification straightforward and that the current system provides no benefit to law enforcement while frustrating owners.