Interstate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act Firearms

The commenter, an individual, strongly opposes the proposed action, arguing that it would make it easier for the USPS to deliver firearms and for individuals to transport assault weapons across state lines. They express concern that these policies prioritize the gun industry over public safety and contribute to gun violence.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that it would make it easier for people with violent intentions to transport firearms across state lines without notification. They advocate for stronger gun laws and more restrictions on who can carry firearms to prevent violence.

An individual is expressing strong support for the proposed rule to eliminate the requirement for advance ATF approval when transporting NFA-regulated firearms for short-term purposes. The commenter argues that the current requirement is an unconstitutional prior restraint that lacks historical basis and burdens law-abiding citizens without improving public safety.

Garioun Martin supports the proposed rule, stating that it simplifies the process for traveling with legally owned firearms and protects his rights against states with restrictive laws. He specifically highlights the "Pass-Through" interstate transportation portion as a much-needed provision for spontaneous travel.

An individual commenter supports the proposal to eliminate advance notice and approval requirements for the short-term interstate transportation of lawfully registered NFA firearms. They argue that owners should not need federal permission to travel with legally possessed property and urge the agency to further minimize reporting requirements.