Interstate Transport and Temporary Export of National Firearms Act Firearms

The General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church opposes the proposed rule because it removes the pre-travel approval requirement for certain firearms. They argue that public safety should be prioritized over convenience and that the rule puts communities at risk of gun violence.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices compromises public safety. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary to prevent these weapons from being moved into prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because it removes the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary for public safety and that removing the tracking paperwork is dangerous.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices compromises public safety. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary to prevent these weapons from being moved into prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe it reduces oversight of highly regulated firearms, such as machine guns and short-barreled rifles. They argue that removing pre-travel approvals and allowing pass-through transportation in states where these weapons are banned compromises public safety.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for machine guns, short-barreled rifles, and destructive devices compromises public safety. They argue that maintaining government oversight is necessary to prevent these weapons from being moved into prohibited areas.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule because they believe removing the pre-travel approval requirement for certain firearms poses a public safety risk. They argue that maintaining oversight is necessary to prevent illegal trafficking and the movement of weapons into prohibited areas.

The commenter, a former police officer and current NRA instructor, supports the proposed rule. They argue that individuals who have passed background checks should not be treated with suspicion or required to seek permission to travel with legally permitted firearms.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that removing pre-travel approval requirements for machine guns and other regulated firearms reduces federal oversight. They express concern that a notification system would allow weapons to move before review is complete and that pass-through transportation undermines state-level public safety laws.