Elimination of Time-in-Grade

The commenter opposes the elimination of time-in-grade, arguing that it replaces objective fairness with manager discretion and risks favoritism. They request that OPM implement strict safeguards, audit agencies, and delay the rule's effective date to allow for the creation of objective review boards.

The commenter opposes the elimination of the Time-in-Grade (TIG) requirement, arguing that it lacks sufficient oversight, creates administrative burdens for HR, and risks inconsistent promotion standards. They propose a "Competency-Based Accelerated Promotion Waiver" (CBAPW) framework as a less burdensome alternative that maintains the 52-week baseline while allowing for specific, high-performing exceptions.

A current federal employee supports the proposed elimination of time-in-grade requirements for advancement. They argue that removing these restrictions will allow for a more merit-based system that rewards high-performing employees and helps retain top talent.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to eliminate time-in-grade requirements, arguing that promotions should be based on qualifications and performance. They believe this change will increase agency flexibility and improve the federal hiring process while maintaining fair selection standards.

The commenter supports the elimination of the mandatory 52-week Time-in-Grade requirement, arguing that promotions should be based on merit and performance rather than time served. They recommend that OPM provide clear implementation guidance, supervisor training, and data monitoring to ensure consistency and fairness across agencies.

The commenter, a federal employee, opposes the elimination of the time-in-grade requirement, arguing that it undermines the merit-based civil service and risks promoting unqualified individuals. They suggest that the 52-week requirement should remain a standard floor to ensure proper training and career progression.

The commenter opposes the elimination of the 52-week Time-in-Grade (TIG) requirement, arguing that it serves as a necessary preventive control against favoritism and ensures sustained performance. They request that OPM provide empirical evidence that removing the requirement will not increase the risk of inequitable promotion practices.

A federal employee supports the elimination of time-in-grade requirements, arguing that these rules prevent qualified individuals from being promoted based on merit and skills. The commenter notes that they have consistently exceeded performance expectations but remain ineligible for higher positions due to arbitrary calendar requirements.