Comment from Anonymous

I am writing in opposition to OPM-2026-0067-0001 in my role as a federal employee and American citizen. I believe this rule weakens the merit-based civil service and the United States. I urge OPM to withdraw or heavily modify this rule for the reasons that follow. The 52-week service requirement is a basic safeguard against rapid acceleration of employees not fit for positions, be that due to nepotism or political interests that run counter to the civil service. This acceleration also harms the employee: a rapid acceleration in grade may come without the expected training or organizational support, leading to underperformance in the new duties and adverse actions against the employee. Beyond these things, elimination of the 52-week requirement would likely disrupt designed career ladders for employees, especially in grades 5 through 9. OPM is correct that rewards for the highest performing employees are limited in the federal service, but the 52-week should remain as a floor across all job series. Any promotion exceptions to the minimum should be limited and reserved for exceptional service to the United States, and other ways to recognize highest performers should be reviewed and bolstered.