National Wildlife Refuge System; Request for Information on Implementation of Drain Tile Setbacks
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- National Wildlife Refuge System; Request for Information on Implementation of Drain Tile Setbacks
- Posted
- Jul 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Jul 24, 2026 – Aug 8, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-14995
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Migratory waterfowl habitat | Waterfowl conservation | Wetland protection and restoration |
|---|---|---|---|
Ducks Unlimited AdvocacySupport Chris Sims, representing Ducks Unlimited, urges the U.S. | |||
Montana Wetlands and Waterfowl AdvocacySupport Mark Mariano, representing Montana Wetlands and Waterfowl, urges the U.S. |
11 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 24 comments from the past week
24 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 28, 2026Mike DOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 28, 2026Tom HendersonOpposeIndividual
Tom Henderson opposes the proposed drain tile setbacks, arguing that they ignore the environmental benefits of rural wetlands. He suggests that the action is politically motivated and advocates for more wetlands rather than restrictions.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Chris McNellisOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed implementation of drain tile setbacks, arguing that draining wetlands harms aquifers, topsoil retention, and waterfowl reproduction. They urge the agency not to proceed with any plans to drain wetlands.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Sam JohnsonOpposeIndividual
A duck hunter expresses strong opposition to the proposed drain tile setbacks, arguing that the resulting reduction in water levels will eliminate critical habitat for migrating ducks. The commenter emphasizes the negative impact this action will have on waterfowl populations and the hunting culture.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Patrick BurnsOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Craig StoneSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026John GabrielsonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that deregulation will cause permanent damage to wetlands and the water system. They advocate for the preservation and restoration of wetlands to provide flood prevention, natural filtration, and benefits to wildlife and humans.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Terry WilsonSupportIndividual
Terry Wilson, a duck hunter, supports the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's current wetland easement drain tile setback rule. He argues that the rule is essential for protecting critical breeding habitats in the Prairie Pothole Region, honoring long-standing conservation easements, and preserving the investments made by hunters and conservationists.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Robert PetrachOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that draining wetlands will lead to increased flooding, higher wildfire risks, and a degradation of the local environment and wildlife habitats. They emphasize the importance of maintaining current wetland conditions to manage heavy rains and cool the local area.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Tim YoderSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed action by suggesting that drain tile setbacks should be measured from the outermost edge of wetland vegetation or water. They argue that maintaining water levels is crucial for local agriculture and the broader ecosystem.
Read comment →
