Oil and Gas Leasing

The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas royalty regulations, arguing that the action prioritizes the narrow economic interests of the powerful few over the public good and the protection of public lands. They express concern that the administrative processes intended to hear all voices are being bypassed to favor short-term objectives.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.

The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.

The commenter, a retired teacher and environmental activist, opposes the proposed rule because it focuses on oil and gas leasing rather than renewable energy. They argue that the government should prioritize transitioning to renewable sources to combat climate change and request that the proposal be edited to include "renewable" energy.

An individual commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing regulations, arguing that the action prioritizes corporate wealth over the protection of public lands. They characterize the proposal as a destruction of the environment for the benefit of "vulture investors" and corporations.