Oil and Gas Leasing
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Oil and Gas Leasing
In response to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted on July 4, 2025, and Executive Order 14154, entitled, “Unleashing American Energy,” dated January 20, 2025, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is proposing to modify its existing regulations pertaining to royalties due on oil and natural gas lost on Federal and Indian leases. These modifications would reduce unnecessary compliance burdens for operators and streamline the BLM’s royalty determinations on lost oil or natural gas.
- Posted
- Jun 24, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 24, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-12734
- CFR
- 43 CFR Parts 3000 3100 3110 3120 3130 3140 3150
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Bonding requirements | Oil and gas leasing regulations | Water quality protection |
|---|
1 organization-typed comment could not be identified.
Campaigns
Organized form-letter drives, separated from organic one-off comments.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 2 comments from the past week
2 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule to modify royalty regulations for oil and gas, arguing that fossil fuel combustion contributes to climate change and environmental damage in Colorado. They suggest the BLM should instead focus on promoting renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and geothermal.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 23, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter, a UC California Naturalist educator, opposes the proposed oil and gas lease sale for specific parcels in the Bakersfield and Central Coast Field Offices. They argue that development in these areas would fragment vulnerable habitats, harm endangered species, and undermine the conservation purposes of the Carrizo Plain National Monument and the Lokern-Buena Vista Area of Critical Environmental Concern.
Read comment → - Jul 21, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing regulations, arguing that they favor industry profits over environmental protection and public safety. They specifically criticize the reduction of clean-up bonds and the shortened public comment period.
Read comment → - Jul 17, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
A Montana resident and life science educator opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing rules. The commenter argues that the changes reduce public input and financial requirements for companies, potentially shifting the costs and environmental impacts of development onto the public.
Read comment → - Jul 12, 2026Comment on FR Doc # 2026-12734OpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing regulations, arguing that public lands should be preserved for conservation and public enjoyment rather than being exploited by corporations for drilling.
Read comment →
