Oil and Gas Leasing

An individual opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas royalty regulations, arguing that the action would lead to increased fossil fuel emissions and environmental destruction. The commenter advocates for policies that reduce pollution to ensure the survival of human society.

The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas royalty regulations, arguing that expanded fossil fuel development harms human health, contributes to climate change, and creates environmental contamination. They urge the BLM to prioritize scientific evidence, protect vulnerable populations, and maintain strong financial assurance requirements for well cleanup.

The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing regulations, citing concerns over human health, air pollution, and climate change. They urge the BLM to prioritize the protection of vulnerable populations and to consider the cumulative health impacts of fossil fuel development.

The commenter opposes the BLM's proposal to reduce compliance burdens and streamline royalty determinations for lost oil and gas on federal and Indian leases. They argue that the proposal rewards poor operational practices, wastes finite resources, and harms public health and tribal revenue.

The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas leasing regulations, arguing that they weaken environmental safeguards and shift the cost of well cleanup to taxpayers. They express concern over the public health impacts of expanded fossil fuel development, particularly for vulnerable and rural communities.

The commenter opposes the proposed modifications to oil and gas royalty regulations, arguing that expanded fossil fuel development harms human health, contributes to climate change, and creates environmental contamination. They urge the BLM to prioritize scientific evidence, protect vulnerable populations, and maintain strong financial assurance requirements for well cleanup.