Removing Youth Handgun Safety Act Notice

Brandon Maddox, CEO of Silencer Central / BANISH Suppressors, supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice. He argues that the notice is a superfluous "information artifact" that does not affect the underlying statutory prohibitions and creates an unnecessary administrative burden for Federal Firearms Licensees.

A gun owner supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. The commenter argues that the current requirement is an unauthorized administrative addition and advocates for the ATF to limit regulations to those authorized by Congress.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement, arguing that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of such notices. They state that the rule correctly removes an unauthorized administrative requirement without affecting the YHSA's substantive provisions.

The commenter, identifying as a gun owner, supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. They argue that the ATF lacks the regulatory authority to impose this requirement and that the rule correctly aligns with the Gun Control Act.

The commenter, identifying as a longtime gun owner, supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement. They argue that the ATF lacks the authority to require these notices and view the current requirement as an unauthorized administrative burden on gun dealers.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement, arguing that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of such notices. They contend that the requirement is an unauthorized administrative add-on that imposes costs without improving compliance.

An individual commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement. They argue that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of these notices and that the rule correctly eliminates an unauthorized administrative burden.

The commenter, identifying as a gun owner, supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice. They argue that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to require FFLs to distribute the notice and that it constitutes an unauthorized administrative burden.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement, arguing that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of such notices. They state that the rule correctly removes an unauthorized administrative requirement without affecting the YHSA's substantive provisions.