Removing Youth Handgun Safety Act Notice

The commenter, identifying as a gun owner, supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. They argue that the ATF lacks the regulatory authority to impose this specific administrative requirement.

Felix De La Garza supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. He suggests that while the paper notice should be removed, the ATF should still require a mechanism to confirm that the purchaser has been made aware of the act.

The commenter opposes the proposed action, arguing that the agency is overstepping its legislative authority by adding rules not explicitly authorized by Congress. They express a general desire for less bureaucracy and fewer regulations.

A gun owner supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. The commenter argues that the current requirement is an unauthorized administrative addition and advocates for the ATF to limit regulations to those authorized by Congress.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. They argue that the ATF lacks the regulatory authority to impose such requirements and that the rule correctly removes an unauthorized administrative addition.

The commenter, identifying as a gun owner, supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement for FFLs to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. They argue that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to impose this specific administrative requirement.

The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement, arguing that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of such notices. They state that the rule correctly removes an unauthorized administrative requirement without affecting the YHSA's substantive provisions.