Removing Youth Handgun Safety Act Notice
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Removing Youth Handgun Safety Act Notice
- Posted
- May 8, 2026
- Comment period
- May 8, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-09165
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Administrative burden reduction | Regulatory burden and cost | Repeal of youth handgun safety act notice |
|---|---|---|---|
National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. Trade associationSupport The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) supports the ATF's proposal to remove the requirement for federal firearm |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 19, 2026National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc.SupportTrade association📎 Attachment
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) supports the ATF's proposal to remove the requirement for federal firearms licensees to provide and post Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. The organization argues that these requirements are now superfluous due to the widespread availability of information and the existence of private safety initiatives like Project ChildSafe.
Read comment → - Jul 9, 2026Silencer Central / BANISH SuppressorsSupportBusiness📎 Attachment
Brandon Maddox, CEO of Silencer Central / BANISH Suppressors, supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice. He argues that the notice is a superfluous "information artifact" that does not affect the underlying statutory prohibitions and creates an unnecessary administrative burden for Federal Firearms Licensees.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Brandon YoungSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 26, 2026Joe WilsonSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 25, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement, arguing that the rule is an unnecessary administrative burden with no statutory basis. They state that the requirement has not improved compliance and that the government already has a notice and comment process in place.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Henry BlakeSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
An individual citizen supports the proposed rule to remove the paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). The commenter argues that the change removes a duplicative administrative burden for small businesses without compromising the law's core safety goals.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Mark von DwingeloSupportBusiness
The commenter, an FFL (Federal Firearms Licensee), supports the proposed rule to remove the requirement to distribute paper Youth Handgun Safety Act notices. They argue that the mandate lacks a statutory basis and imposes unnecessary costs on businesses without improving compliance.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026STAN LATTASupportIndividual
A former Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL) and gun owner supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement. The commenter argues that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of these notices and that removing the requirement eliminates an unauthorized administrative cost.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Anonymous AnonymousSupportIndividual
An individual commenter supports the proposed rule to remove the Youth Handgun Safety Act notice requirement. They argue that the ATF lacks the statutory authority to mandate the distribution of these notices and that the rule correctly eliminates an unauthorized administrative burden.
Read comment →
