Regulations Defining Engaged in the Business as a Dealer in Firearms
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Regulations Defining Engaged in the Business as a Dealer in Firearms
- Posted
- May 6, 2026
- Comment period
- May 6, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-08919
- CFR
- 27 CFR Part 478
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
| Organization | Definition of "engaged in business" | Second amendment rights |
|---|---|---|
Gun Owners of America AdvocacyOppose Gun Owners of America and Gun Owners Foundation oppose the proposed rule, arguing that it fails to sufficiently walk bac |
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- 4 comments from the past week
4 comments match your current view and arrived in the last week. Read this week's comments with stance, commenter type, and AI summaries on the paid plan.
- Jul 24, 2026The United Methodist Church - General Board of Church and SocietyOpposeAdvocacy
The General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates loopholes for criminal actors and straw purchasers. They contend that the rule would make it easier for bad actors to traffic weapons and put communities at risk of gun violence.
Read comment → - Jul 27, 2026Marianne BaldwinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 27, 2026Danette DennisonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates loopholes for criminal actors and straw purchasers by allowing unlicensed sellers to bypass background checks and record-keeping requirements. They contend that the rule is unsafe and would make it easier for bad actors to traffic weapons.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Mary LyonsOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed regulations, arguing that they loosen gun sales standards and increase public safety risks. They advocate for stricter requirements and paperwork for gun sales to prevent unregulated and unlicensed sales.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2026Mary BeaudoinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 24, 2026Patricia DillonOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates loopholes for criminal actors and straw purchasers by exempting unlicensed sellers from background checks. They highlight the dangers of illegal gun trafficking based on their personal experience living in rural Haiti.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2026Jean FlannellyOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 23, 2026Anonymous AnonymousOpposeIndividual
The commenter opposes the proposed rule, arguing that it creates loopholes for criminal actors and straw purchasers by exempting unlicensed sellers from background checks and record-keeping. They advocate for stricter gun laws rather than the proposed simplifications.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Teresa BlumensteinOpposeIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Monet LahnOpposeIndividualRead comment →
