NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice

The commenter, identifying as a public lands advocate, opposes any rollbacks or weakening of wilderness and wild lands management. They urge the Department to maintain robust protections for ecological integrity, cultural resources, and long-term preservation.

A constituent and resident of the state requests that the office urge the National Park Service to halt land exchanges on Cumberland Island until a formal oversight review is conducted and the results are made public. The commenter argues that current plans lack transparency and accountability.

A constituent and resident of the state requests that the office urge the National Park Service to halt land exchanges on Cumberland Island until a formal oversight review is conducted and the results are made public. The commenter argues that current plans lack transparency and accountability.

A Georgia resident is requesting that the National Park Service halt land exchanges and conduct a formal oversight review regarding the wilderness status of Cumberland Island. The commenter argues that the park should prioritize wilderness preservation over the convenience of private landholders.

Priscilla Kirouac, a resident of Winter Park, Colorado, opposes the Department of the Interior's review of wilderness stewardship policies. She argues that the review is an attempt to sell and reduce protections for public lands, which she believes should be preserved for environmental health and public enjoyment.

An Alaskan resident expresses concern that the proposed policy changes could weaken protections for wilderness areas and lead to increased development. The commenter argues for the continued and increased protection of these lands to preserve natural ecosystems and resources for future generations.

The commenter expresses strong support for the proposed wilderness stewardship policy. They argue that the wilderness must be protected through strong laws and adequate financial and personnel resources to preserve natural resources for future generations.

Sara Loza expresses support for the policy, arguing that public lands require more protection and restrictive regulations. She emphasizes the need for competent stewardship to prevent interference from humans and corporations.