More Than Just Parks
AdvocacyOppose
Wilderness designation
Wilderness protection
Wilderness stewardship policy
NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice
NPS-2026-0100-0001Notice
Comments
159
Last activity Jul 30, 2026
Deadline
11 days
Closes Aug 15, 2026
Net supportiSupport minus oppose · campaigns included
-55%
-55% excluding campaigns
Document
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice
- Posted
- Jun 15, 2026
- Comment period
- Jun 15, 2026 – Aug 15, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-11958
Analysis
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Include campaigns
Analyzed 156 of 159 comments
98%· analysis in progress
Stance breakdown
-55%
Net support
Support34Oppose120Other2Not yet analyzed3
Aggregates include form-letter campaigns. Excluding them, net support is -55% across organic comments.
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Individual
152
Advocacy
4
Not yet analyzed
3
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Posted Jun 15, 2026Deadline Aug 15, 2026
Jun 15Jun 22Jun 29Jul 6Jul 13Jul 20Jul 27
Support34Oppose120Other2
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Support
Oppose
Other
Individual
22%
77%
1%
Advocacy
0%
75%
25%
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Choose up to five.
1 organization filed this week — visible to subscribers.
| Organization | Wilderness designation | Wilderness protection | Wilderness stewardship policy |
|---|---|---|---|
More Than Just Parks AdvocacyOppose Jim Pattiz, representing More Than Just Parks, opposes the review of Director's Order #41, arguing that it could weaken |
Comments
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.