NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review DO 41_FR Notice

The commenter opposes any revisions to the NPS wilderness stewardship policy that would weaken protections for wilderness study areas and lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that such changes would permanently destroy the wilderness character of these lands and request that existing standards be preserved.

The commenter opposes any potential weakening of wilderness and wild lands management policies during the ongoing reviews by the BLM, FWS, and NPS. They urge the Department to prioritize long-term preservation and maintain robust management standards to protect ecological integrity and natural heritage.

An individual visitor to the National Parks opposes any revisions to the NPS wilderness stewardship policy that would weaken protections for wilderness study areas and lands with wilderness characteristics. The commenter argues that these protections are essential for preserving the permanent character of wild lands for future generations.

A resident of Colorado expresses firm opposition to the proposed policy reviews by the BLM, FWS, and NPS. The commenter argues that these reviews could lead to a weakening of wilderness and wild lands management, advocating for long-term protection over short-term exploitation.

The commenter, an environmental scientist, opposes any revisions to the National Park Service's wilderness stewardship policy that would weaken protections for wilderness study areas and lands with wilderness characteristics. They argue that the agency has provided no reasoned justification for such changes and urge the preservation of existing standards.

A private individual opposes the proposed policy review, arguing that it could weaken protections for Wilderness Study Areas and existing Wilderness. The commenter requests that existing standards of care be preserved to protect these lands as a legacy for future generations.

An individual commenter opposes any revisions to the Wilderness Stewardship Policy Review that would weaken protections for Wilderness Study Areas and existing Wilderness. They argue that the current standards should be preserved to protect these lands as a legacy for future generations.

An individual citizen opposes the proposed review of the NPS Level 2 Wilderness Stewardship Policy, arguing that it could weaken protections for Wilderness Study Areas and existing Wilderness. The commenter requests that the agency preserve existing standards to ensure the continued protection of wild lands for future generations.

An individual commenter opposes the proposed policy review, arguing that it could weaken protections for Wilderness Study Areas and existing Wilderness. She requests that current standards be preserved to ensure these lands are protected for future generations.

An individual commenter opposes the proposed revision to the wilderness stewardship policy, arguing that it could weaken protections for Wilderness Study Areas and existing Wilderness. She requests that the agency preserve existing standards to ensure the continued protection of wild lands for future generations.