Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- Posted
- Feb 4, 2025
- Comment period
- Feb 4, 2025 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Environmental impact of mifepristone | Informed consent and side effects | Mifepristone access and ipv | Mifepristone safety and efficacy | Rems requirements |
|---|
12 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 19, 2025Comment from Sunday LaneSupportIndividualRead comment →
- Aug 7, 2025Comment from Eric HussarOpposeAcademic
Dr. Eric Hussar, representing the American Academy of Medical Ethics, opposes the removal of restrictions on mifepristone. He argues that the proposed action endangers women and babies, citing newer data that suggests a significantly higher rate of severe side effects than previously reported.
Read comment → - Jul 31, 2025Comment from Arkansas Right to LifeOpposeAdvocacy
Arkansas Right To Life, an advocacy organization, opposes the citizen petition by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. They argue that the FDA should maintain strict Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for mifepristone, including in-person physician visits and ultrasound requirements, to ensure safety and prevent unauthorized use.
Read comment → - Jul 29, 2025Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A former university department chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology opposes the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' petition. The commenter argues that induced abortion is not healthcare and urges the CDC to investigate claims regarding the potential negative effects of abortion on both the mother and the fetus.
Read comment → - Jul 28, 2025Comment from Anna Del DucaOpposeIndividual📎 Attachment
The commenter, a nurse and member of Silent No More, argues that Mifepristone is dangerous and causes severe psychological and spiritual trauma for parents who undergo abortions. She advocates for supportive measures such as food, housing, and emotional support for pregnant individuals instead of abortion access.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2025Comment from Mike EnglerOpposeIndividual
The commenter argues that the FDA should more thoroughly research medications used for contraception and abortion to ensure informed consent regarding the risks to the mother and the "unwanted life." They express opposition to the current practices, suggesting that the protection of the mother should not come at the expense of the life being formed.
Read comment →
