Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- Posted
- Feb 4, 2025
- Comment period
- Feb 4, 2025 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Environmental impact of mifepristone | Informed consent and side effects | Mifepristone access and ipv | Mifepristone safety and efficacy | Rems requirements |
|---|
12 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Aug 4, 2025Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A registered nurse who performs limited ultrasounds argues that removing the REMS for abortion pills would endanger women's health by allowing for abortions without proper pregnancy dating and confirmation. The commenter contends that the medical community is prioritizing political views over patient safety and that the abortion industry prioritizes profit over health.
Read comment → - Jul 31, 2025Comment from Arkansas Right to LifeOpposeAdvocacy
Arkansas Right To Life, an advocacy organization, opposes the citizen petition by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. They argue that the FDA should maintain strict Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for mifepristone, including in-person physician visits and ultrasound requirements, to ensure safety and prevent unauthorized use.
Read comment → - Jul 24, 2025Comment from AnonymousOpposeIndividual
A medical worker in a women's health facility argues that patients who use medication to induce an abortion without in-person medical supervision face significant health risks and ineffective results. The commenter advocates for regulated, in-person medical care including ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation.
Read comment → - Jul 23, 2025Comment from Advancing American Freedom FoundationOpposeAdvocacy📎 Attachment
The Advancing American Freedom Foundation opposes the ACOG petition, arguing that the FDA should not lift Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) for mifepristone. They urge the FDA to reinstate stricter regulations, including in-person physician consultations, citing concerns over the drug's safety and the potential for serious adverse events.
Read comment →
