Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Citizen Petition from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- Posted
- Feb 4, 2025
- Comment period
- Feb 4, 2025 – ?
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Environmental impact of mifepristone | Informed consent and side effects | Mifepristone access and ipv | Mifepristone safety and efficacy | Rems requirements |
|---|
12 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jan 27, 2026Supplemental Comment from BU Program on Repro Justice, Immigrants’ Rights Human Trafficking Program, Racial Justice Movement Lawyering ClinicSupportAcademic📎 Attachment
The Boston University School of Law's various legal programs submit a supplemental comment supporting the removal of the Mifepristone Shared System Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). They argue that restricting access to mifepristone increases intimate partner violence (IPV) and imposes significant social and economic burdens, particularly on marginalized and low-income communities.
Read comment → - Nov 20, 2025Comment from RHITES (Reproductive Health Initiative for Telehealth Equity & Solutions)SupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
RHITES (Reproductive Health Initiative for Telehealth Equity & Solutions) supports the citizen petitions requesting that the FDA eliminate restrictions on mifepristone access under the Single Shared System REMS Program. They argue that telehealth for medication abortion is safe, effective, and provides critical benefits by reducing travel burdens, costs, and stigma for patients.
Read comment → - Apr 11, 2025Comment from Legal VoiceSupportAdvocacy📎 Attachment
Legal Voice, Family Violence Appellate Project, Sexual Violence Law Center, and the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence submit a joint comment in support of a petition to remove the Mifepristone Shared System Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). They argue that maintaining easy access to mifepristone, particularly through telehealth and mail delivery, is critical for the safety and reproductive autonomy of survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) and marginalized communities.
Read comment →
