Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments—Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Inclusion on the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances List
Details
The document's own metadata, straight from the source system.
- Title
- Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments—Bulk Drug Substances Nominated for Inclusion on the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances List
- Posted
- Apr 16, 2026
- Comment period
- Apr 16, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026
- FR Doc
- 2026-07361
- Topics
Overview
What the public is saying — stance, who's commenting, and the issues they raise.
Stance breakdown
Who commented
Breakdown by commenter type.
Comments over time
Weekly arrivals, stacked by stance.
Support × commenter type
How each type splits across stance.
Issues raised
The docket's canonical issues. Select one to browse its comments.
Position map
Who stands where on each issue?
Every non-silent position is backed by an excerpt from the comment.
Issues shown
Uncheck an issue to choose another.
| Organization | Compounding safety and access | Add specific peptides to 503a list | Peptide efficacy for healing | Patient access and affordability | Side effects of peptides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Elevan Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. BusinessSupport 1Elevan Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., a 503A compounding pharmacy, supports the inclusion of BPC-157, TB-500, MOTS-c, and Se | · | · | |||
Adaptogenics Inc. (operating as Human Extension Sciences) BusinessSupport Gurinder Sandhu, CEO of Adaptogenics Inc. | · | · | |||
Alpha & Omega Concierge PLLC BusinessSupport Richard Cron, an advanced practice registered nurse and founder of Alpha & Omega Concierge PLLC, argues in favor of incl | · | · | |||
American Academy of Peptide Medicine (AAPM) AdvocacySupport The American Academy of Peptide Medicine (AAPM) submits a formal request for the inclusion of seven specific peptide sub | · | · | |||
American Pharmacists Association (APhA) Trade associationOppose The American Pharmacists Association (APhA) opposes the inclusion of the nominated peptides on the 503A Bulks List at th | · | · | |||
BIOMOD Compounds LLC BusinessSupport BIOMOD Compounds LLC supports the inclusion of seven specific peptides on the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances List, pr | · | · | · | ||
Coastline Wellness BusinessSupport Chris McKinley, Clinical Director of Coastline Wellness, supports including specific peptides (such as BPC-157 and TB-50 | · | · | |||
Collaborative for Evidence-Based Medicines (CEBM) AdvocacyOppose The Collaborative for Evidence-Based Medicines (CEBM) opposes the inclusion of the nominated peptide substances on the 5 | · | · | |||
Elysium Health, Inc. BusinessSupport Elysium Health, Inc. | · | · | |||
Foreviva Medical Clinic BusinessSupport Dr. | · | · | |||
IPEX Health BusinessSupport John Orton, CEO of IPEX Health, urges the Committee to include seven specific peptides on the 503A Bulk Drug Substances | · | · | |||
medical aesthetics and wellness clinic BusinessSupport Dr. | · | · | |||
Medisca, Inc. BusinessSupport Medisca, Inc., a global healthcare company and FDA-registered repackager, supports the inclusion of additional substance | · | · | · | · | |
Obesity Action Coalition AdvocacySupport The Obesity Action Coalition (OAC) supports the committee's efforts to ensure patient safety and product quality regardi | · | · | · | ||
Obesity Medicine Association AdvocacyOppose The Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) opposes the inclusion of MOTS-c on the section 503A Bulk Drug Substances List. | · | · | · | ||
Powers Family Pharmacy BusinessSupport Randy Powers, a compounding pharmacist at Powers Family Pharmacy, strongly supports including BPC-157 (free base and ace | · | · | |||
Texas Pharmacy Association Trade associationSupport The Texas Pharmacy Association supports adding seven nominated peptides to the Section 503A Bulk Drug Substances List fo | · | · |
2 organization-typed comments could not be identified.
Explorer
Every mirrored comment — filter by stance, campaign, or issue.
- Jul 22, 2026Comment from Abdullah ArlesheaSupportIndividual
A board-certified RN and Family Nurse Practitioner argues that the FDA should preserve access to compounded peptide therapies for individualized patient care. The commenter emphasizes that compounding is essential for patients who do not respond well to conventional medications and highlights their own successful clinical and personal experience with these treatments.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Krajewski DianeSupportIndividual
A registered nurse and patient supports preserving access to compounded peptide therapies, arguing that they provide essential, individualized treatment options for proactive healthcare. The commenter warns that restricting access will drive patients toward unregulated, unsafe gray-market products.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Harshfield RachelSupportIndividual
The commenter, a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist, supports the FDA's consideration of policies that preserve access to individualized compounded medications. They argue that personalized treatments are important for patients whose needs are not met by commercially available options.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Fitzgerald TanyaSupportIndividual
The commenter, a patient who has successfully used physician-supervised compounded peptide therapy to manage metabolic health and perimenopause, supports the action of preserving patient access to these therapies. She emphasizes the importance of personalized medicine and requests that the FDA maintain options for appropriately prescribed compounded treatments.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Hendricks BiancaSupportIndividual
A patient who has successfully used compounded peptide therapy for weight loss advocates for the preservation of access to compounded medications. They argue that personalized treatment plans are essential for patient well-being and that limiting access could drive patients toward unregulated, unsafe alternatives.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Texiera DenaOtherIndividualRead comment →
- Jul 22, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
An individual expresses support for the action by arguing that it preserves patient choice and access to individualized care, specifically regarding pharmaceutical-grade peptides. The commenter emphasizes the importance of maintaining access to these substances for personal health goals.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from WIELICZKO KATHYSupportIndividual
Kathy Wieliczko, a nurse practitioner, supports the preservation of access to individualized compounded peptide therapies. She argues that restricting these therapies under clinical oversight would not improve safety but would instead push patients toward unregulated sources.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from Lancellotti StephanieOpposeIndividual
The commenter, an occupational therapist and health coach, opposes the proposed restrictions on bulk drug substances. They argue that restricting access to peptides will drive patients toward unlicensed providers and advocate for the ability of patients and providers to make individualized treatment decisions.
Read comment → - Jul 22, 2026Comment from AnonymousSupportIndividual
The commenter, an emergency room nurse and patient, supports maintaining access to regulated compounding of peptide medications. They argue that providing these medications through legitimate compounding pharmacies ensures patient safety and prevents individuals from seeking unregulated, potentially dangerous alternatives.
Read comment →
